References Chapter 3
3.1 Introduction
3.2 RECOGNITION OF BROADBAND FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
[ii] Crandall, R. and Jackson.C (2001), “The $500 Billion Opportunity: The Potential Economic
Benefit of Widespread Diffusion of Broadband Internet Access,” mimeo, Criterion
Economics, Washington, DC.
http://www.criterioneconomics.com
/docs/Crandall_Jackson_500_Billion_Opportunity_July_2001.pdf
[iii] Pociask, S., “Building a Nationwide Broadband Network: Speeding Job
Growth”, TeleNomic Research, LLC with support from the New Millennium
Research
Council (NMRC), February 25, 2002.
http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/
event-02-25-2002/jobspaper.pdf
[iv] Yankee Group (2001), “The Collaborative Commerce Value Statement: A $223 billion Cost Savings Opportunity Over Six Years,” Module B-to-B Commerce & Applications, Vol. 6, No. 6, Yankee Group, Boston, Mass., June 14, 2001.
[v] Varian, H., Litan, R., Elder, A., and Schulter, J.,
“The Net Impact Study:
The Projected Economic Benefits of the Internet in the
United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany”, (Jan.2002).
http://netimpactstudy.com/Net-Impact_Study_Report.pdf
[vi] Centre
for Economics and Business Research Ltd. (2003), “ The Economic Impact of a
Competitive Market for Broadband”, prepared for the Broadband Industry Group in
the United Kingdom.
http://www.bigfuture.org/
cebr%20Final%20Report.pdf
[vii] ACIL Tasman (2004), “Regional Economic Impacts of Broadband Adoption in Victoria”, prepared for
Multimedia Victoria, August 2004.
http://www.mmv.vic.gov.au/
broadband/Economicbenefits
[viii] Lehr, W., Osorio, C., Gillett, S., and Sirbu, M, (2005) “Measuring Broadband’s Economic Impact”, paper presented at the 33rd Research Conference on Communication, Information, and Internet Policy (TPRC), Arlington, VA, and revised as of October 4, 2005. http://itc.mit.edu/itel/docs/2005/MeasuringBB_EconImpact.pdf
3.3 RECOGNITION OF BROADBAND FOR SOCIAL BENEFITS AND INCLUSION
[x] Singer, M. (2002), “The
Economic and Social Benefits of Broadband”, Telecommunications Industry
Association (US) for Question 20/2:
Examination of access technologies for broadband communications, August
27, 2002.
http://www.tiaonline.org/policy/
broadband/TIA_Contribution_for_ITU-D_20-2_on_Broadband_8-27.pdf
[xi] ibid
[xii] Tanner, T. “Moving Beyond Wireless Broadband to Carrier Grade
Infrastructure”, Presentation Slides.
http://www.wcai.com/pdf/2005/
05presentations/Tanner_Todd.pdf
3.4 THE INTERNET AND BROADBAND SERVICES
[xiii] World Internet Usage and Population Statistics,
[xiv] OECD Broadband Statistics, June 2005.
http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,2340,en_2649_ 37441_35526608_1_1_1_37441,00.html#Graphs2005
[xv] OECD Broadband Statistics, December 2004.
http://www.oecd.org/document/ 60/0,2340,en_2649_37441_2496764_1_1_1_37441,00.html
[xvi] CableLabs, Cable Modem/DOCSIS primer
3.5 CARRIERS FAILURE TO DELIVER UBIQUITOUS AFFORDABLE CGB
no References
3.6 IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES (E.G. WIRELESS) IN BROADBAND DELIVERY
[xvii] Vos, E.,” MuniWireless,
Second Anniversary Report”, July 2005.
http://www.baller.com/pdfs/
Muniwireless_7-05.pdf
3.7 EASE AND AFFORDABILITY OF ENTRY FOR ALL SEGMENTS OF SOCIETY
3.8 INCREASING DEMAND FOR FTTH IN NGB SERVICES DELIVERY
no References3.9 CARRIERS FAILURE TO ADDRESS NGB INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS
[xix] IDATE
(2005), “FTTH Situation in Europe”,
prepared for the Europe FTTH Council, January 2005
http://www.europeftthcouncil.com/extra/
Articles/IDATE_study.pdf
[xx] Yankee Group
(2004), “Mass-Market Fiber Remains Distant on the European Horizon”.
http://www.europeftthcouncil.com/extra/
Articles_Yankee_study.pdf
[xxi] Mediaweek, “Verizon Rolls Out FiOS TV in Texas Town”, 22 September 2005.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/search/
article_display.jsp?schema=&vnu_content_id=1001179194
3.10 OPENNESS AS A FUNDAMENTAL NEW DRIVER
[xxii] Lehr, W., Sirbu, M., and Gillett, S. (2004), “Broadband Open Access: Lessons from
Municipal Network Case Studies”, September 2004.
http://itc.mit.edu/itel/docs/2004/
Broadband_Open_Access.pdf
[xxiii] The Allen Consulting Group
(2003), “True Broadband, Exploring the
Economic Impacts”, study conducted for Ericsson, September 2003.
http://www.ericsson.com.
au/broadband/true_broadband.asp
[xxiv] Utopia case study will be provided on the InfoDev web platform.
3.11 OTHER FACTORS
[xxv] Information on state legislation is provided on Civitum website.
http://www.civitium.com/states.shtml
[xxvi] Ó Siochrú, S. and Girard, B.,”Community Based Networks and Innovative Technologies”, UNDP, 2005
http://propoor-ict.comunica.org/content/pdfs /00_UNDP_Report_p.1-58.pdf
