Skip to content. Skip to navigation

The infoDev World Bank Study

Document Actions

2.1 INTRODUCTION

by Malcolm Matson last modified 2006-04-27 15:37


Since broadband is a relatively new phenomenon, there has been a limited amount of empirical research that has attempted to measure its economic impact at both the national and local level.  The first studies undertaken were designed to provide a macroeconomic impact assessment of its impact on the national economy.

 

The first group of these studies were done on the U.S. economy and have figured prominently in the economic literature on broadband.  Crandall and Jackson (2001 and 2002) estimated that widespread deployment of broadband could result in a $500 billion annual increase in the U.S. GDP through the impact that it would have on changes to the consumption behaviour of consumers.[i]   Criterion Economics (2003) estimated that ubiquitous adoption of broadband could result in the creation of more than 1.2 million jobs in the United States.[ii]  The Yankee Group (2001) forecast that universally available broadband could result in cost savings to the U.S. economy of $233 billion over six years [iii] and Momentum (2003) estimated that adoption of Internet business solutions resulted in $155 billion in savings over the period 1998 – 2001.[iv]

 

A study on the economic impact of broadband on the United Kingdom yielded similar results.  In a study conducted by CEGR (2003) for the Broadband Industry Group, it estimated that the productivity benefits from broadband could be as much as 2.5% resulting in an annual increase to the UK GDP of £21.9 million and an increase in annual net exports of £11 billion by 2015.[v]

 

One of the first studies to assess the impact of broadband on a regional economy was done on the State of Victoria in Australia by ACIL Tasman (2004).  It concluded that broadband would have significant impacts on productivity, employment and investment. Over the period from 2004 – 2015, the annual increase in Gross State Product would be 0.82%, employment would increase by 0.5% annually and overall investment by about 10.5% for the period.[vi]

 

This research helped to establish the relationship between economic growth and broadband deployment at the national and regional level. It was not until 2003 that research was directed at individual communities.  There are three studies at the community level (i.e. Cedar Falls, South Dundas Township and Lake County, Florida) that have been considered as benchmark works and are the most referenced as justification for the establishment of local access networks.  Although none of these are true Local Open Access Networks, they still demonstrate that the establishment of these networks to provide high-speed Internet access did generate economic benefits to the community and region served.

 

The case studies and anecdotal evidence are designed to demonstrate the importance that local access networks can have to the economic development of communities and to provide a greater understanding of the reasons why communities were prepared to make the investment.  Many of the examples deal with local access networks that are not open to other suppliers either because of a conscious policy on the part of the local government or the inability to attract multiple suppliers because of the size of the community.  Although true Local Open Access Networks would provide greater economic efficiencies, as demonstrated in the work of the Allen Consulting Group (2003)[vii] for the Queensland Government in Australia, the experiences of these community networks do provide a great deal of insight towards their contribution to ensuring growth in smaller and more remote communities and regions.


next chapter ->



 
REFERENCES



[i] Crandall, R. and Jackson.C (2001), “The $500 Billion Opportunity: The Potential Economic Benefit of Widespread Diffusion of Broadband Internet Access,” mimeo, Criterion Economics, Washington, DC.

http://www.criterioneconomics.com/docs/Crandall_Jackson_500_ Billion_Opportunity_July_2001.pdf

 

[ii] Pociask, S., “Building a Nationwide Broadband Network: Speeding Job Growth”, TeleNomic Research, LLC with support from the New Millennium Research

Council (NMRC), February 25, 2002.

http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/event-02-25-2002/ jobspaper.pdf

 

[iii] Yankee Group (2001), “The Collaborative Commerce Value Statement: A $223 billion Cost Savings Opportunity Over Six Years,” Module B-to-B Commerce & Applications, Vol. 6, No. 6, Yankee Group, Boston, Mass., June 14, 2001.

 

[iv] Varian, H., Litan, R., Elder, A., and Schulter, J., “The Net Impact Study:

The Projected Economic Benefits of the Internet in the United States, United

Kingdom, France and Germany”,  (Jan.2002).

 http://netimpactstudy.com/Net-Impact_Study_Report.pdf

 

[v] Centre for Economics and Business Research Ltd. (2003), “ The Economic Impact of a Competitive Market for Broadband”, prepared for the Broadband Industry Group in the United Kingdom.

http://www.bigfuture.org/cebr%20Final%20Report.pdf

 

[vi] ACIL Tasman (2004), “Regional Economic Impacts of Broadband Adoption in Victoria”, prepared for Multimedia Victoria, August 2004.

http://www.mmv.vic.gov.au/broadband/Economicbenefits

 

[vii]  The Allen Consulting Group (2003),  “True Broadband, Exploring the Economic Impacts”, study conducted for Ericsson, September 2003.

http://www.ericsson.com.au/broadband/true_broadband.asp

2. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Chapter 2 provides more detailed information on studies that have demonstrated the economic impact of broadband deployment at the national, regional and local level and the role of local open access networks. It also deals with the impact of broadband deployment and adoption on the issues of social benefit and inclusion.
2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 CASE STUDIES ON ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BROADBAND 2.3 ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE 2.4 SOCIAL BENEFIT AND INCLUSION 2.4.1 PUBLIC SAFETY 2.4.2 PUBLIC SAFETY APPLICATIONS 2.4.3 E-GOVERNMENT 2.4.4 E-GOVERNMENT APPLICATIONS