4.1 INTRODUCTION
In order to meet the increasing demands on local Governments to provide enhanced levels of services to meet the economic and social demands of its citizens, there has been greater attention focussed on the use of more sophisticated electronic communications platforms and services. Local Governments are increasingly examining the deployment of their own broadband communications networks, as a more cost effective and sometimes the only alternative to the reliance on the incumbent telecommunications industry.
The primary drivers for municipal
involvement in developing local access networks vary, but the most often cited
reasons are to:
- Lower the cost of providing municipal services
- Increase government efficiency and productivity
- Promote local economic development and competitiveness
- Address social development and inclusion
- Improve the availability and affordability of broadband Internet services
It may be self evident, but
nonetheless worth noting, that in any local geographic area (particularly in
the developed world) it is the local
public administration and other local public sector agencies that generate
and receive the greatest ‘intra-area’ communication traffic. Although these public sector agencies are
necessarily required to communicate with central government and other agencies
beyond the limits of their own area, nevertheless there is an undoubted
priority to communicating with the constituency they serve – which, by
definition, are all located within
that area. This being so, the local
Government administration and other public agencies are likely to be by far the
greatest financial beneficiaries in terms of financial savings from the
deployment of a LOAN type infrastructure.
Unfortunately, most public policy in
the developed world around this e-Government topic is developed from a Central
Government perspective around the individual ministries and agencies such that
emphasis and public policy direction is directed towards linking within and not
across public agencies (e.g. linking hospitals with hospitals across the
country on a private network, schools with schools, police with police and so
on). This ‘top-down’ approach to local
broadband deployment within the public sector totally misses the potential
benefits that we believe will accrue at the local community level from a policy
which encourages all the public sector agencies within that local area to be
linked with each other and the constituency they jointly serve.
In order to gain an improved
understanding of municipal broadband networks, it is important to examine the
entire process and the factors influencing how these networks develop from
concept to implementation.
