6.1 INTRODUCTION
As evidenced by experiences
throughout the world, Government policy has had a significant impact on
broadband deployment and the development of Local Open Access Networks
(LOANs). A major issue for Government
policy makers is a specific recognition of the need for these types of networks
and the role of local Governments and voluntary organisations in establishing
them.
Local Access Networks deployed by
local Governments and voluntary organisations have generally been in response
to the lack of available and affordable broadband services. Networks operated by voluntary organisations
tend to be open; whereas, those operated by local Governments are either open
or closed.
Local Access Networks have been
actively encouraged by Governments in a number of countries as a means of
providing broadband services to rural and remote areas. Virtually every country has sparsely
populated areas that are costly to serve and considered uneconomic by incumbent
service providers. Although it is more
desirable to have open access, many of these networks are closed due to the
difficulty in attracting multiple service providers.
Even countries like Japan, which has been very successful
in the deployment of broadband infrastructure in most of the country through a
mixture of regulatory and fiscal policies, are faced with digital divide issues
in rural areas. Its approach has been to
encourage public private partnerships through Government financing to develop
community based networks, such as the Hyogo Information Highway to deliver ADSL and the Nankoku
City WLL System to provide wireless broadband services.[i]
In some cases, local Governments
have established Local Open Access Networks to ensure that the community has an
advanced network infrastructure designed to provide it with a competitive
advantage that goes beyond the provision of a basic broadband service. This is the approach that has been taken in
projects like UTOPIA and the deployment of other FTTH systems in Sweden and the Netherlands encouraged by Government
policy. These types of projects have
often been the most controversial as they are, in effect, developing a new
paradigm in the ICT sector by providing a common platform that is open for use
by all service providers. The deployment
of FTTH LOANs may be the optimal solution; but they are unlikely to provide an
operational model for developing economies.
The continued expansion of Local
Access Networks will depend on both the financial viability of these networks
and Government policy that can either restrict or promote their
development. It is clear that the
support for Local Open Access Networks is mixed and that it will become an
increasingly more important issue that will have to be addressed by all
Governments.
References
[i] Takada, Y., “Promoting Broadband: The Case of Japan”,
ITU Workshop on Promoting Broadband, 7 April 2003.
http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/ni/promotebroadband/casestudies/
japan.pdf
